POC 4 Tests et rétroaction || POC 4 Testing and Feedback

Test BTdC POC4 - TBoC POC4

Tiger Team PoC 4

Scope:

Sdl Studio (plugin) Integration
Testing of workflow(s) for plugin use
Developing Standardization and Best Practices for each standard Workflow section
Internal resources only.

Testing and standardizing – Workflows with Pre and Post Processing
– several project types based on volume
Testing and standardizing – TEP in Sdl Studio
Testing and standardizing – Best Practices and 1 page documentation per project type

TIMELINE

t.b.d.

PoC-Single

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

First Last

Email*

Project Number*

Workflow Phase*

Client based Feedback

1 Client - Ease of use overall

2 File Upload - Source/Reference

3 Scope and Classification

4 Add special instructions and Comments?

Client: Comments and Notes

PM Feedback

1 PM - Ease of use overall

2 Review of Files for scope, pre-processing needs

3 Initial Word Count Helpful?

4 Client instructions clarity

5 Completeness of request?

6 PM - Workflow OK?

7 Assign pre-processing including TAT & Instructions

TAT = Turn Around Time

8 Assigned pre-processing or Self

PM: Comments and Notes

Time spent on task

Pre-Processing Feedback

1 Pre - Ease of Use overall

2 Scope and instructions

3 Access to working files and reference files

4 Pre-processing easy or complex

5 Neccessary tools avail.

6 Processing time (hrs)

7 Segmentation Clean?

8 # of re-work needed?

# of re-work and uploads until segmentation was clean

9 Effort

10 File Type

Pre-Processing comments and notes

Translator Feedback

Translation performed in:*

1 Overall Impression

2 task assignment notification by the system

3 Able to start translating immediately (scheduling)

4 Any Segmentation errors

5 Skill Match - Correct Subject Specialty assigned

6 Quality of pre-translations (100% matches)

7 Quality of Fuzzy matches (<100% matches)

8 Quality of Fuzzy difference display

9 Speed Fuzzy look-up (system responsiveness)

10 Source Identification clear (fuzzy and 100, which TM)

11 Speed auto-propagation

12 Quality of Termbase

13 Inserting/Use of suggested terms (ease)

14 Adding terms to TB (ease)

15 Changing/Modifying terms in TB (ease)

16 TERM QA - Notification (Use)

17 Volume of Tags in Text

TAGs = Formatting marks and similar

18 Clarity of Tags and Placement

19 Spell Check

20 Grammar Check

21 Consistency Check

22 Tag Error Check

23 Number/Dates Error Check

24 Adding/Changing Segment Comments/Notes

25 Preview function

26 preview for flow of language

27 all tools avail

28 Concordance search

29 Learning curve User-Interface

30 Repetitions indication?

31 Find/Replace function?

32 Segment Filtering

33 Translation effort

34 Time Spent

Translator comments and notes

Revisor Feedback

Proofreading, Revision performed in*

1 - Notification received

2 - Able to start Immediatly?

3 - TAT Schedule ok

TAT = Turn Around Time

4 - Overall Impression

5 - All necessary tools?

6 - Assignment Skill Match

7 - Quick or Full review

8 - Filtering of segments

9 Filtering error types

10 - Segmentation errors?

11 - Volume of Tags ok?

TAGs - Formatting marks and similar

12 - Preview Flow of Language

13 - Editing Environment

14 - Segment Source information

15 - Terminology Display

16 - Terminology Quality

17 - add/change Terminology

18 - Terminology errors

19 - Spell Check

20 - Grammar Check

21 - Consistency Check

22 - fuzzy match errors

23 - Number/Date errors

24 - Tag errors

Missing or Misplaced Tags (formatting Marks)

25 - completeness of translation

26 - Concordance Search

27 - Repetition indication

28 - find/replace function

29 - TM/fuzzy match use by translator

30 - Track Changes display

31 - Preview for final read

32 - Overall linguistic Quality

33 - add/change segment comments

34 - System responsiveness

35 - Revision effort

36 - Time Spent:

Revisor Comment and Notes

TR Review Changes

Action of sending the revised file back to translator for Review of Revisor changes, Accept/Reject, and Continuous improvement Skills

TR- Review of Changes performed in*

1 - Track Changes clear

2 - Accept/Reject function

3 - Filtering Changed Only

4 - Comments Clear

5 - Consistency of revision

6 - Consistent Term adjustments

7 - Changed terms present in Termbase?

8 - Over-Editing / Under-Editing

9 - Preferential Changes

10 - Error free?

11 - Overall Clarity of Changes

12 Review Effort

TR - Change review Comments Notes

14 Time Spent

Post Processing Feedback

1 - Notification received

2 - Deadline OK?

3 - Was Target Doc created?

4 - Missing translations?

5 - Missing text/Graphic?

6 - Hide/Unhide process

7 - Target Layout Quality

8 - Initial client instruction applied

9 - Lost formatting? (fonts)

10 - TOC regenerated

TOC - Table of Content

11 - Styles Changed/missing

12 - Structural integrity

13 - Lost formatting? (Image placemet)

14 - Hyperlink Adjustments

15 - Any sever errors?

16 - processing time (min)

17 - Assignment Skill match

18 - Upload Target

19 Effort

Post-Process - Comments Notes

Delivery

1 Overall

2 Delivery of files (selection)

3 Delivery instruction complete

4 Delivery on time

5 Missing Files?

6 Quality Post processing

7 Time spent

Delivery - Comments Notes

Client - Receipt

1 delivery on time

2 Delivery Complete

3 Instructions followed

4 Quality of delivery

Client receiving - Comments Notes

Support and FAQ

POC1 – Single